Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![₹1.37 Cr ‘Consultancy’ Charges Not Proven as Business Expense: ITAT Upholds Income Tax Disallowance against Jeweler [Read Order] ₹1.37 Cr ‘Consultancy’ Charges Not Proven as Business Expense: ITAT Upholds Income Tax Disallowance against Jeweler [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/22/2134135-consultancy-.webp)
₹1.37 Cr ‘Consultancy’ Charges Not Proven as Business Expense: ITAT Upholds Income Tax Disallowance against Jeweler [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Bangalore Bench has upheld the disallowance of ₹1.37 crore claimed by a jewellery company as consultancy...
![₹1.37 Cr ‘Consultancy’ Charges Not Proven as Business Expense: ITAT Upholds Income Tax Disallowance against Jeweler [Read Order] ₹1.37 Cr ‘Consultancy’ Charges Not Proven as Business Expense: ITAT Upholds Income Tax Disallowance against Jeweler [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/22/2134135-consultancy-.webp)
₹1.37 Cr ‘Consultancy’ Charges Not Proven as Business Expense: ITAT Upholds Income Tax Disallowance against Jeweler [Read Order]
ITAT found no evidence of genuine services or business purpose behind the payment, confirming that the expenditure was not allowable under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act
![Delay Beyond 45‑Day Limit under IBC Section 61: NCLAT Rejects CIRP Appeals, Rules e‑Portal Upload No Ground for Extension [Read Order] Delay Beyond 45‑Day Limit under IBC Section 61: NCLAT Rejects CIRP Appeals, Rules e‑Portal Upload No Ground for Extension [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/17/2133493-delay-beyond-45day-limit-under-ibc-section61-nclat-rejects-cirp-appeals-rules-eportal-upload-no-ground-for-extension-.webp)
Delay Beyond 45‑Day Limit under IBC Section 61: NCLAT Rejects CIRP Appeals, Rules e‑Portal Upload No Ground for Extension [Read Order]
The ruling reinforces the judiciary’s consistent stance that timely filing is a mandatory procedural safeguard under the IBC, and reliance on e‑portal upload dates cannot override statutory deadlines
![Delay Beyond 45‑Day Limit under IBC Section 61: NCLAT Rejects CIRP Appeals, Rules e‑Portal Upload No Ground for Extension [Read Order] Delay Beyond 45‑Day Limit under IBC Section 61: NCLAT Rejects CIRP Appeals, Rules e‑Portal Upload No Ground for Extension [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/17/2133493-delay-beyond-45day-limit-under-ibc-section61-nclat-rejects-cirp-appeals-rules-eportal-upload-no-ground-for-extension-.webp)
Delay Beyond 45‑Day Limit under IBC Section 61: NCLAT Rejects CIRP Appeals, Rules e‑Portal Upload No Ground for Extension [Read Order]
The ruling reinforces the judiciary’s consistent stance that timely filing is a mandatory procedural safeguard under the IBC, and reliance on e‑portal upload dates cannot override statutory deadlines


![Audit revealed Non-inclusion of Transportation costs in Assessed Value for Paying Central Excise Duty: CESTAT Rejects Appeal [Read Order] Audit revealed Non-inclusion of Transportation costs in Assessed Value for Paying Central Excise Duty: CESTAT Rejects Appeal [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/22/2134127-auditjpg.webp)
![Appearance Before GSTAT: Vakalatnama, Change of Counsel and Restrictions Under Rules 72 to 75 Explained [Read Order] Appearance Before GSTAT: Vakalatnama, Change of Counsel and Restrictions Under Rules 72 to 75 Explained [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/22/2134126-change-of-counseljpg.webp)
![Claiming Deductions on Additional Employee Costs? Key Form under Income Tax Act, 2025 Explained [Read Order] Claiming Deductions on Additional Employee Costs? Key Form under Income Tax Act, 2025 Explained [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/22/2134116-deductions-additional-employee-costs-key-form-income-tax-act-2025-taxscan.webp)
![Delhi Dept of Trade & Taxes Assigns Work Portfolios and Link Officers to Senior Officials, Full List Here [Read Order] Delhi Dept of Trade & Taxes Assigns Work Portfolios and Link Officers to Senior Officials, Full List Here [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/22/2134117-delhi-dept-of-tradejpg.webp)





![Duplicate GST Orders for Same Tax Period Unsustainable: Madras HC quashes Duplicate Order, Remands for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order] Duplicate GST Orders for Same Tax Period Unsustainable: Madras HC quashes Duplicate Order, Remands for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/22/2134103-gstjpg.webp)


![Service Tax Demand of ₹26.26 Lakh Quashed: CESTAT Confirms Exemption for Own-Truck Operations [Read Order] Service Tax Demand of ₹26.26 Lakh Quashed: CESTAT Confirms Exemption for Own-Truck Operations [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/19/2133657-service-tax-demand-quashed-cestat-confirms-exemption-own-truck-operations-taxscan.webp)
![Excess Service Tax Paid Due to Error Treated as Deposit, Not Tax: CESTAT sets aside Rejection of Refund Claim [Read Order] Excess Service Tax Paid Due to Error Treated as Deposit, Not Tax: CESTAT sets aside Rejection of Refund Claim [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/11/2132800-cestat-new-delhi-service-tax-refund-excess-service-tax-paid-cestat-service-tax-refund-taxscan.webp)
![CESTAT Dismisses Jal Mahal Resorts Appeal; Service Tax Refund Rejected as Total Turnover Exceeds ₹10 Lakh Limit [Read Order] CESTAT Dismisses Jal Mahal Resorts Appeal; Service Tax Refund Rejected as Total Turnover Exceeds ₹10 Lakh Limit [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/10/2132660-cestat-new-delhi-service-tax-refund-jal-mahal-resort-cestat-service-tax-case-taxscan.webp)
![Service Tax Demand Invalid Without Independent Verification of Transactions: CESTAT Quashes ₹56.72 Lakh Demand Based Solely on Income Tax Data [Read Order] Service Tax Demand Invalid Without Independent Verification of Transactions: CESTAT Quashes ₹56.72 Lakh Demand Based Solely on Income Tax Data [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/07/2132329-cestat-kolkata-service-tax-demand-independent-verification-income-tax-data-case-taxscan.webp)
![Service Tax Demand Based on CBDT Inputs & ITR Data Without Proper Hearing: Karnataka HC Remands Matter [Read Order] Service Tax Demand Based on CBDT Inputs & ITR Data Without Proper Hearing: Karnataka HC Remands Matter [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/03/31/2131069-service-tax-demand-based-on-cbdt-inputs-itr-data-without-proper-hearingjpg.webp)

Kavi Priya
![Service Tax Not Payable on liquidated damages collected from supplier on account of non-performance of the contracts: CESTAT [Read Order] Service Tax Not Payable on liquidated damages collected from supplier on account of non-performance of the contracts: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/CESTAT-CESTAT-Bangalore-Service-Tax-liquidated-damages-Taxscan.jpg)
Yogitha S. Yogesh
Rupesh Sharma


Saagarika Gopinath

![Purchase Tax u/s 12 TNVAT Not Payable Due to Software Glitch: Madras HC Sets aside Tribunal Order in Form 1 Filing Issue [Read Order] Purchase Tax u/s 12 TNVAT Not Payable Due to Software Glitch: Madras HC Sets aside Tribunal Order in Form 1 Filing Issue [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/22/2134107-purchase-tax-u-s-12-tnvat-not-payable-due-to-software-glitch-madras-hc-sets-aside-tribunal-order-in-form-1-filing-issue-site-imagejpg.webp)
![Centre Removes ADD on Lithograde Aluminium Coils Above 1150 mm After Delhi HC Order [Read Order] Centre Removes ADD on Lithograde Aluminium Coils Above 1150 mm After Delhi HC Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/22/2134087-lithograde-aluminium-coils-delhi-hc-taxscan.webp)
![DGFT Restricts Export of High-Grade Baryte [Read Notification] DGFT Restricts Export of High-Grade Baryte [Read Notification]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/04/21/2133968-dgft-restricts-export-of-high-grade-baryte-site-imagejpg.webp)



